Just last week, nearly 100,000 fishes washed up on the shores of the Arkansas River, dead. And, thousands of red-winged blackbirds fell from the sky and plummeted to the ground where they were also found dead. The scene repeated itself in Southern Louisiana where 500 red-winged blackbirds recently plunged out of the sky, dead on arrival, and in Chesapeake Bay, thousands of dead fish have begun washing up onto bay shores.
What do all these mean to us? Some said its the waves from the cell phone towers. Some said someone is doing secret experiments on these living things. Some said it could be due to the pesticides. Some just blame it on some 'diseases'...
Whatever the reason is, I think it is really time for everyone to understand the risks of our modern lifestyles that we enjoy so much would bring to us. Some degree of drastic changes should be done.
I remember I once heard from Dr.Lai Chiu-Nan about the incidence of a large flock of birds were seen plummeted to the ground and population of honey bees were greatly reduced just after the invention and growing implementation of mobile telecommunication. There were research that shown after the bees were put near to a live mobile phone for more than 15 minutes, they lost their direction to go back to their hives. Could it be the same for those birds as well, losing their flying direction? There are many studies and researches out there that have already proven that the electromagnetic field from the wireless (be it mobile communication or wireless internet), electric appliances and cabling would cause harmful effects to our health.
If possible, would you take a short break from your busy schedule and start checking back your life on the below:
*are you using wireless internet at home?
if yes, at least turn off during the night when you do not need it, so that you get to have a true rest for your body. Changing to cable would be even better choice.
*are you using pesticide in your garden to keep bugs and weeds from your beautiful flowers?
if yes, please try to turn to organic gardening by doing composting
*are you using lots of chemical cleaning agents in your house?
if yes, please start to change them to using garbage enzymes that is friendly to the environment. They do equally good job to help you clean up the toilet too. (send me email if you would like to learn how to make the garbage enzymes, the only cost is the brown sugar from grocery stores)
*are you or your maid cleaning your car porch with running water from the tap?
if yes, its time to change back to broom and mop with a pail of water to conserve water supply
*are you using anti-microbial cleaning agent because of doctors said we need to kill all bacteria whenever possible?
If yes, please revert back to the normal soap and water. Normal soap and water is sufficient to kill the bacteria on your hands. The ingredient that provide anti-microbial property actually is harmful to the environment and our health (circulate back to us from water and food), and the degree of side-effects to our health is yet to be concluded.
These action might add some extra efforts to your life, but it could also save you from more complicated problems in future.
For our Health
For our Children
For our Future Generation
Friday, January 7, 2011
Study: Children exposed to far too much radiation from imaging scans
I suppose not only children are exposed to lots of harmful vaccines, but also many radiation scans that were not even invented during our childhood time.
Many always wonder why are there so many little lives suffering in the hospital from all sorts of deadly diseases... Could it be because we have exposed ourselves and our children to too much of unnecessary radiation? Should we take all the scans as advised by any doctors?
In many corporate companies, exempt staffs are offered the benefit of health check with the expenses covered by the company. For example, the company that I work in, all managers get to go for a free complete health check every 2 years. These health check includes blood test, urine test, fitness, cholesterol, papsmear and x-ray scan on the chest. Everyone who gets the benefit would go for the full packaged offered, including the chest x-ray, regardless of nothing wrong with the chest... I guess, that is the norm. I did that too on my first check. But now I realized how wrong I had been. X-ray (and other scans) should be avoided as much as possible, only do it when really necessary as it causes harmful effects that we might not aware of immediately.
===============================
(NaturalNews) The amount of radiation-emitting imaging scans administered to children is on the rise, and many experts are worried about the long-term negative effects of this toxic exposure. A new study published in the journal Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine has found that the average child will receive seven radiation scans by the time he or she is 18 years old. And besides X-rays, many children now receive CT scans, which emit up to 400 times the amount of radiation as chest X-rays.
"Today's children are undoubtedly getting many more of these [scans] than previous generations," explained Dr. Adam Dorfan, lead author of the study from the University of Michigan Medical School. "That's particularly concerning."
Researchers compiled health insurance data from over 355,000 children living Arizona, Texas, Florida and Wisconsin, to arrive at their findings. They found that eight percent of evaluated children received at least one CT scan in a three-year period, and three percent received two or more in the same period. Researchers also determined that roughly six million U.S. children will receive at least one CT scan within a three-year period.
A New York Times report from March sheds a bit of light onto why imaging scans have been on the increase, particularly heavy-radiation CT scans. According to the report, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials have been quick to approve CT scans for all sorts of uses, despite warnings from its own scientists that the scans often needlessly expose patients to very high levels of cancer-causing radiation (http://www.naturalnews.com/029577_C...).
The same report indicates that since 1980, the rate of CT scans has increased by over 2300 percent. And roughly 14,000 people die every year as a result of imaging scan radiation exposure.
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/030920_radiation_children.html#ixzz1AKQvoVMS
==============================
I try to stay away from hospitals and clinics as much as possible, and I'm thankful that I am in no need to submit medical claim from my insurance offered by my workplace for my family. Should always remember that not claiming any medical claim is not a waste but a blessing.
Wish everyone enjoy a happy and healthy new year!
Many always wonder why are there so many little lives suffering in the hospital from all sorts of deadly diseases... Could it be because we have exposed ourselves and our children to too much of unnecessary radiation? Should we take all the scans as advised by any doctors?
In many corporate companies, exempt staffs are offered the benefit of health check with the expenses covered by the company. For example, the company that I work in, all managers get to go for a free complete health check every 2 years. These health check includes blood test, urine test, fitness, cholesterol, papsmear and x-ray scan on the chest. Everyone who gets the benefit would go for the full packaged offered, including the chest x-ray, regardless of nothing wrong with the chest... I guess, that is the norm. I did that too on my first check. But now I realized how wrong I had been. X-ray (and other scans) should be avoided as much as possible, only do it when really necessary as it causes harmful effects that we might not aware of immediately.
===============================
(NaturalNews) The amount of radiation-emitting imaging scans administered to children is on the rise, and many experts are worried about the long-term negative effects of this toxic exposure. A new study published in the journal Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine has found that the average child will receive seven radiation scans by the time he or she is 18 years old. And besides X-rays, many children now receive CT scans, which emit up to 400 times the amount of radiation as chest X-rays.
"Today's children are undoubtedly getting many more of these [scans] than previous generations," explained Dr. Adam Dorfan, lead author of the study from the University of Michigan Medical School. "That's particularly concerning."
Researchers compiled health insurance data from over 355,000 children living Arizona, Texas, Florida and Wisconsin, to arrive at their findings. They found that eight percent of evaluated children received at least one CT scan in a three-year period, and three percent received two or more in the same period. Researchers also determined that roughly six million U.S. children will receive at least one CT scan within a three-year period.
A New York Times report from March sheds a bit of light onto why imaging scans have been on the increase, particularly heavy-radiation CT scans. According to the report, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials have been quick to approve CT scans for all sorts of uses, despite warnings from its own scientists that the scans often needlessly expose patients to very high levels of cancer-causing radiation (http://www.naturalnews.com/029577_C...).
The same report indicates that since 1980, the rate of CT scans has increased by over 2300 percent. And roughly 14,000 people die every year as a result of imaging scan radiation exposure.
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/030920_radiation_children.html#ixzz1AKQvoVMS
==============================
I try to stay away from hospitals and clinics as much as possible, and I'm thankful that I am in no need to submit medical claim from my insurance offered by my workplace for my family. Should always remember that not claiming any medical claim is not a waste but a blessing.
Wish everyone enjoy a happy and healthy new year!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)